olmOCR alternatives

Short answer

We track 8 self-hosted alternatives to olmOCR: PaddleOCR, MinerU, Paperless-ngx, OCRmyPDF, Unstract, paperless-gpt, Docling Serve and Paperless-AI.

olmOCR has had no commit since Mar 25, 2026, which is one reason to look at alternatives.

PaddleOCR (same category): no GPU server needed, an actively maintained project (olmOCR is stale) and larger community (92.2k vs 19.8k GitHub stars).

MinerU (same category): no GPU server needed, an actively maintained project (olmOCR is stale) and larger community (83.0k vs 19.8k GitHub stars).

Paperless-ngx (same category): no GPU server needed, an actively maintained project (olmOCR is stale) and larger community (47.6k vs 19.8k GitHub stars).

Last updated · how we rank · sources

olmOCR alternatives compared

Self-hosted alternatives to olmOCR, ranked
#AppAdvantages over olmOCREst. server costOfficial hardwareLicenseStarsLast commitCompare
—olmOCR (this app)Stale (no commit in 180+ days)GPU server (not estimated)not publishedApache-2.019.8kMar 25, 2026—
1 PaddleOCR
Same category
no GPU server needed; an actively maintained project (olmOCR is stale); larger community (92.2k vs 19.8k GitHub stars) not estimated (no official RAM figure) not published Apache-2.0 92.2k Sep 16, 2026 olmOCR vs PaddleOCR
2 MinerU
Same category
no GPU server needed; an actively maintained project (olmOCR is stale); larger community (83.0k vs 19.8k GitHub stars)
Trade-off: olmOCR has fewer license conditions (Permissive vs Custom / conditional); simpler deploy (one container vs a multi-container stack)
from €11.99/mo minimum 2 GB RAM MinerU Open Source License (Apache-2.0 with additional terms) 83.0k Nov 3, 2026 olmOCR vs MinerU
3 Paperless-ngx
Same category
no GPU server needed; an actively maintained project (olmOCR is stale); larger community (47.6k vs 19.8k GitHub stars)
Trade-off: olmOCR has fewer license conditions (Permissive vs Copyleft (GPL)); simpler deploy (one container vs a multi-container stack)
not estimated (no official RAM figure) not published GPL-3.0 47.6k Nov 3, 2026 olmOCR vs Paperless-ngx
4 OCRmyPDF
Same category
no GPU server needed; an actively maintained project (olmOCR is stale); larger community (35.2k vs 19.8k GitHub stars)
Trade-off: olmOCR has fewer license conditions (Permissive vs Copyleft (GPL))
not estimated (no official RAM figure) not published MPL-2.0 35.2k Oct 25, 2026 olmOCR vs OCRmyPDF
5 Unstract
Same category
no GPU server needed; an actively maintained project (olmOCR is stale)
Trade-off: olmOCR has fewer license conditions (Permissive vs Network copyleft (AGPL)); larger community (19.8k vs 7.4k GitHub stars); simpler deploy (one container vs a multi-container stack)
from €35.99/mo minimum 8 GB RAM AGPL-3.0 7.4k Nov 2, 2026 olmOCR vs Unstract
6 paperless-gpt
Same category
no GPU server needed; an actively maintained project (olmOCR is stale)
Trade-off: olmOCR has larger community (19.8k vs 2.8k GitHub stars); simpler deploy (one container vs a multi-container stack)
not estimated (no official RAM figure) not published MIT 2.8k Oct 16, 2026 olmOCR vs paperless-gpt
7 Docling Serve
Same category
no GPU server needed; an actively maintained project (olmOCR is stale)
Trade-off: olmOCR has larger community (19.8k vs 1.9k GitHub stars)
not estimated (no official RAM figure) not published MIT 1.9k Oct 27, 2026 olmOCR vs Docling Serve
8 Paperless-AI
Same category
no GPU server needed
Trade-off: olmOCR has larger community (19.8k vs 6.0k GitHub stars); simpler deploy (one container vs a multi-container stack)
not estimated (no official RAM figure) not published MIT 6.0k Mar 31, 2026 olmOCR vs Paperless-AI

Ranked by the number of objective advantages each alternative has over the app (cheaper estimated server cost, lighter official RAM figure, no GPU needed, fewer license conditions, better maintenance status, at least 1.5× the GitHub stars, simpler deploy). Ties: same-category apps first, then more GitHub stars. License order used: Permissive (MIT/Apache) → Open core → Copyleft (GPL) or Custom conditions → Network copyleft (AGPL) → Source-available. Archived projects are not listed as alternatives.

What each alternative is

  • PaddleOCR (Document processing): OCR toolkit and document AI engine that turns scans, images and PDFs into LLM-ready text, Markdown or JSON.
  • MinerU (Document processing): Document parser that converts PDFs, scans and Office files into clean Markdown or JSON for LLMs and RAG.
  • Paperless-ngx (Document processing): Document management system that OCRs scans into a searchable archive, auto-tags them and adds optional LLM suggestions and chat.
  • OCRmyPDF (Document processing): Command-line tool and Docker image that adds a searchable OCR text layer to scanned PDFs, with a watched-folder service.
  • Unstract (Document processing): No-code LLM platform that turns invoices, forms and other documents into structured JSON.
  • paperless-gpt (Document processing): LLM add-on for paperless-ngx that does better OCR and writes titles, tags and correspondents.
  • Docling Serve (Document processing): Docling document conversion (PDF, Office, images to Markdown/JSON) as a self-hosted API with a demo UI.
  • Paperless-AI (Document processing): AI auto-tagging and document chat for Paperless-ngx (currently unmaintained).

olmOCR alternatives: FAQ

What is the best self-hosted alternative to olmOCR?

By our objective ranking: 1. PaddleOCR (no GPU server needed; an actively maintained project (olmOCR is stale); larger community (92.2k vs 19.8k GitHub stars)) 2. MinerU (no GPU server needed; an actively maintained project (olmOCR is stale); larger community (83.0k vs 19.8k GitHub stars)) 3. Paperless-ngx (no GPU server needed; an actively maintained project (olmOCR is stale); larger community (47.6k vs 19.8k GitHub stars)). "Best" depends on the features you need; the ranking only counts cost, hardware, license, maintenance, community size and deploy complexity.

Is there a cheaper alternative to olmOCR?

Not by our estimate. olmOCR: GPU server (not estimated). Alternatives: PaddleOCR (not estimated (no official RAM figure)), MinerU (from €11.99/mo), Paperless-ngx (not estimated (no official RAM figure)), OCRmyPDF (not estimated (no official RAM figure)), Unstract (from €35.99/mo), paperless-gpt (not estimated (no official RAM figure)), Docling Serve (not estimated (no official RAM figure)), Paperless-AI (not estimated (no official RAM figure)).

Which olmOCR alternative has the most permissive license?

None has fewer conditions than olmOCR (Apache-2.0 (Permissive)). Alternatives: PaddleOCR: Apache-2.0 (Permissive); MinerU: MinerU Open Source License (Apache-2.0 with additional terms) (Custom / conditional); Paperless-ngx: GPL-3.0 (Copyleft (GPL)); OCRmyPDF: MPL-2.0 (Copyleft (GPL)); Unstract: AGPL-3.0 (Network copyleft (AGPL)); paperless-gpt: MIT (Permissive); Docling Serve: MIT (Permissive); Paperless-AI: MIT (Permissive). Not legal advice.

Which olmOCR alternative needs the least hardware?

PaddleOCR: not published; MinerU: minimum 2 GB RAM; Paperless-ngx: not published; OCRmyPDF: not published; Unstract: minimum 8 GB RAM; paperless-gpt: not published; Docling Serve: not published; Paperless-AI: not published. olmOCR: not published.

Is olmOCR still maintained?

Stale (no commit in 180+ days). Last commit: Mar 25, 2026. Checked Nov 3, 2026.

Related

Sources