llama.cpp vs TextGen (text-generation-webui)

Short answer

llama.cpp: Lightweight C/C++ engine that runs quantized open models on CPU or GPU, with an OpenAI-compatible server. TextGen (text-generation-webui): Local LLM app (formerly text-generation-webui) with a browser UI, OpenAI/Anthropic-compatible API and LoRA training. Both are in our Local model runtimes category.

Choose llama.cpp if you want: fewer license conditions (Permissive vs Network copyleft (AGPL)) and larger community (133k vs 47.7k GitHub stars).

llama.cpp and TextGen (text-generation-webui) publish no official RAM figure, so we cannot compare hosting cost directly.

Last updated · computed from each project's official docs and live GitHub data · sources

llama.cpp vs TextGen (text-generation-webui) side by side

llama.cppTextGen (text-generation-webui)
CategoryLocal model runtimesLocal model runtimes
What it isLightweight C/C++ engine that runs quantized open models on CPU or GPU, with an OpenAI-compatible server.Local LLM app (formerly text-generation-webui) with a browser UI, OpenAI/Anthropic-compatible API and LoRA training.
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
License typePermissiveNetwork copyleft (AGPL)
License conditionsPermissive. Internal and commercial use allowed. Individual models have their own licenses.Free for internal and commercial use. If you modify TextGen and let users interact with it over a network, you must offer them the modified source under AGPL-3.0. Models have their own licenses.
StatusActiveActive
GitHub stars133k47.7k
Last commitOct 30, 2026Aug 17, 2026
Latest releasev0.8.0v4.9
Minimum hardwareNot publishedNot published
Recommended hardwareNot publishedNot published
RAM measured by us437 MiB idle, 489 MiB working (our test, vbuild 11804 (c7fc50941), Oct 22, 2026)Not tested yet
GPUOptional. Runs on CPU (AVX/AVX2/AVX512/AMX, ARM NEON) and supports CPU+GPU hybrid inference for models larger than VRAM. Docker images exist for CUDA, ROCm, SYCL, Vulkan, MUSA and OpenVINO.Optional. Docker variants exist for NVIDIA, AMD, Intel Arc (beta) and CPU-only inference; portable builds come in CUDA, Vulkan, ROCm and CPU-only versions.
Est. server costfrom €11.99/mo (based on our test, not official)Not estimated
Deploy methodDocker (or install script / prebuilt binaries)Docker Compose (built locally from the repo)
Known gotchas3 listed4 listed
TelemetryNot documentedNone (documented)
Calls home by defaultNot documentedNo (documented)
SSO (OIDC / SAML / LDAP)Not documentedNot documented
Audit logNot documentedNot documented
RBACNot documentedNot documented
DetailsFull llama.cpp guide →Full TextGen (text-generation-webui) guide →

Key differences

  • License: llama.cpp: MIT (Permissive). TextGen (text-generation-webui): AGPL-3.0 (Network copyleft (AGPL)).
  • Deploy: llama.cpp: Docker (or install script / prebuilt binaries) · multi-container stack. TextGen (text-generation-webui): Docker Compose (built locally from the repo) · multi-container stack.
  • GitHub stars: llama.cpp: 133k. TextGen (text-generation-webui): 47.7k.
  • Last commit: llama.cpp: Oct 30, 2026. TextGen (text-generation-webui): Aug 17, 2026.
  • Latest release: llama.cpp: v0.8.0 (Oct 28, 2026). TextGen (text-generation-webui): v4.9 (May 20, 2026).

Same for both: Category: Local model runtimes; Official hardware: not published; GPU: optional / see notes; Est. server cost: not estimated (no official RAM figure); Status: Active.

llama.cpp vs TextGen (text-generation-webui): FAQ

llama.cpp or TextGen (text-generation-webui): which should a small business choose?

Choose llama.cpp if you want: fewer license conditions (Permissive vs Network copyleft (AGPL)) and larger community (133k vs 47.7k GitHub stars). llama.cpp and TextGen (text-generation-webui) publish no official RAM figure, so we cannot compare hosting cost directly.

Which is cheaper to self-host, llama.cpp or TextGen (text-generation-webui)?

llama.cpp: not estimated (no official RAM figure). TextGen (text-generation-webui): not estimated (no official RAM figure). Our estimate is the cheapest Hetzner Cloud plan that meets each project's official RAM and vCPU figure; it covers the server only.

How much hardware do llama.cpp and TextGen (text-generation-webui) need?

llama.cpp: not published. TextGen (text-generation-webui): not published.

What is the license difference between llama.cpp and TextGen (text-generation-webui)?

llama.cpp: MIT (Permissive). Permissive. Internal and commercial use allowed. Individual models have their own licenses. TextGen (text-generation-webui): AGPL-3.0 (Network copyleft (AGPL)). Free for internal and commercial use. If you modify TextGen and let users interact with it over a network, you must offer them the modified source under AGPL-3.0. Models have their own licenses. This is a summary, not legal advice.

Is llama.cpp or TextGen (text-generation-webui) more actively maintained?

llama.cpp: Active, last commit Oct 30, 2026. TextGen (text-generation-webui): Active, last commit Aug 17, 2026. GitHub data refreshed Oct 30, 2026.

Which is easier to deploy, llama.cpp or TextGen (text-generation-webui)?

llama.cpp installs via Docker (or install script / prebuilt binaries) (multi-container stack); TextGen (text-generation-webui) via Docker Compose (built locally from the repo) (multi-container stack). llama.cpp lists 3 known gotchas and TextGen (text-generation-webui) lists 4; see each app page.

Related

Sources

Every value is generated from the same verified data as the app pages. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.