PR-Agent vs Tabby
Short answer
PR-Agent: Open-source AI pull-request reviewer that comments and answers questions on PRs. Tabby: Self-hosted AI coding assistant (Copilot alternative) for your team. Both are in our Coding assistants category.
Choose PR-Agent if you want: no GPU server needed and fewer license conditions (Permissive vs Open core).
Choose Tabby if you want: larger community (33.9k vs 13.6k GitHub stars).
PR-Agent publishes no official RAM figure, so we cannot compare hosting cost directly.
Last updated · computed from each project's official docs and live GitHub data · sources
PR-Agent vs Tabby side by side
| PR-Agent | Tabby | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Coding assistants | Coding assistants |
| What it is | Open-source AI pull-request reviewer that comments and answers questions on PRs. | Self-hosted AI coding assistant (Copilot alternative) for your team. |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 (ee directory under a separate license) |
| License type | Permissive | Open core |
| License conditions | Permissive. Internal and commercial use allowed; keep the MIT license notice. | Everything outside the "ee/" directory is Apache-2.0. The ee/ directory has its own license. |
| Status | Active | Active |
| GitHub stars | 13.6k | 33.9k |
| Last commit | Oct 24, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Latest release | v0.48.0 | v0.32.0 |
| Minimum hardware | Not published | Not published |
| Recommended hardware | Not published | Not published |
| RAM measured by us | Not tested yet | Not tested yet |
| GPU | No. Runs as a GitHub Action or short-lived Docker client that calls an LLM API. | NVIDIA GPU recommended. CodeLlama-7B in int8 needs about 8 GB VRAM. int8 needs compute capability 7.0+ (or 6.1), float16 7.0+, bfloat16 8.0+. |
| Est. server cost | Not estimated | GPU server (not estimated) |
| Deploy method | GitHub Action (or Docker) | Docker (CUDA) |
| Known gotchas | 4 listed | 2 listed |
| Telemetry | Not documented | On by default |
| Calls home by default | Yes, by default | Not documented |
| SSO (OIDC / SAML / LDAP) | Not documented | Paid / enterprise only (LDAP paid) |
| Audit log | Not documented | Not documented |
| RBAC | Not documented | Not documented |
| Details | Full PR-Agent guide → | Full Tabby guide → |
Key differences
- License: PR-Agent: MIT (Permissive). Tabby: Apache-2.0 (ee directory under a separate license) (Open core).
- GPU: PR-Agent: optional / see notes. Tabby: needed for practical use.
- Est. server cost: PR-Agent: not estimated (no official RAM figure). Tabby: GPU server (not estimated).
- Deploy: PR-Agent: GitHub Action (or Docker) · single container. Tabby: Docker (CUDA) · single container.
- GitHub stars: PR-Agent: 13.6k. Tabby: 33.9k.
- Last commit: PR-Agent: Oct 24, 2026. Tabby: Jun 30, 2026.
- Latest release: PR-Agent: v0.48.0 (Oct 16, 2026). Tabby: v0.32.0 (Jan 25, 2026).
Same for both: Category: Coding assistants; Official hardware: not published; Status: Active.
PR-Agent vs Tabby: FAQ
PR-Agent or Tabby: which should a small business choose?
Choose PR-Agent if you want: no GPU server needed and fewer license conditions (Permissive vs Open core). Choose Tabby if you want: larger community (33.9k vs 13.6k GitHub stars). PR-Agent publishes no official RAM figure, so we cannot compare hosting cost directly.
Which is cheaper to self-host, PR-Agent or Tabby?
PR-Agent: not estimated (no official RAM figure). Tabby: GPU server (not estimated). Our estimate is the cheapest Hetzner Cloud plan that meets each project's official RAM and vCPU figure; it covers the server only.
How much hardware do PR-Agent and Tabby need?
PR-Agent: not published. Tabby: not published. Tabby needs a GPU for practical use.
What is the license difference between PR-Agent and Tabby?
PR-Agent: MIT (Permissive). Permissive. Internal and commercial use allowed; keep the MIT license notice. Tabby: Apache-2.0 (ee directory under a separate license) (Open core). Everything outside the "ee/" directory is Apache-2.0. The ee/ directory has its own license. This is a summary, not legal advice.
Is PR-Agent or Tabby more actively maintained?
PR-Agent: Active, last commit Oct 24, 2026. Tabby: Active, last commit Jun 30, 2026. GitHub data refreshed Oct 25, 2026.
Which is easier to deploy, PR-Agent or Tabby?
PR-Agent installs via GitHub Action (or Docker) (single container); Tabby via Docker (CUDA) (single container). PR-Agent lists 4 known gotchas and Tabby lists 2; see each app page.
Related
Sources
- PR-Agent GitHub repository: github.com/The-PR-Agent/pr-agent
- PR-Agent documentation, PR-Agent hardware requirements, PR-Agent deploy instructions: qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/installation/github/
- PR-Agent license: github.com/The-PR-Agent/pr-agent/blob/main/LICENSE
- Tabby GitHub repository: github.com/TabbyML/tabby
- Tabby documentation, Tabby deploy instructions: tabby.tabbyml.com/docs/quick-start/installation/docker/
- Tabby license: github.com/TabbyML/tabby/blob/main/LICENSE
- Tabby hardware requirements: tabby.tabbyml.com/docs/faq/
- Hetzner Cloud pricing used for cost estimates (read 2026-10-22): www.hetzner.com/cloud/regular-performance
- GitHub REST API (stars, commits, releases): docs.github.com/en/rest
Every value is generated from the same verified data as the app pages. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.