SGLang vs TextGen (text-generation-webui)

Short answer

SGLang: Fast serving engine for LLMs and multimodal models on GPU servers, with an OpenAI-style API. TextGen (text-generation-webui): Local LLM app (formerly text-generation-webui) with a browser UI, OpenAI/Anthropic-compatible API and LoRA training. Both are in our Local model runtimes category.

Choose SGLang if you want: fewer license conditions (Permissive vs Network copyleft (AGPL)) and simpler deploy (one container vs a multi-container stack).

Choose TextGen (text-generation-webui) if you want: no GPU server needed.

TextGen (text-generation-webui) publishes no official RAM figure, so we cannot compare hosting cost directly.

Last updated · computed from each project's official docs and live GitHub data · sources

SGLang vs TextGen (text-generation-webui) side by side

SGLangTextGen (text-generation-webui)
CategoryLocal model runtimesLocal model runtimes
What it isFast serving engine for LLMs and multimodal models on GPU servers, with an OpenAI-style API.Local LLM app (formerly text-generation-webui) with a browser UI, OpenAI/Anthropic-compatible API and LoRA training.
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
License typePermissiveNetwork copyleft (AGPL)
License conditionsPermissive. Internal and commercial use allowed. Models keep their own licenses.Free for internal and commercial use. If you modify TextGen and let users interact with it over a network, you must offer them the modified source under AGPL-3.0. Models have their own licenses.
StatusActiveActive
GitHub stars38.3k47.7k
Last commitOct 31, 2026Aug 17, 2026
Latest releasev0.5.22v4.9
Minimum hardwareNot publishedNot published
Recommended hardwareNot publishedNot published
RAM measured by usNot tested yetNot tested yet
GPUYes for the documented install path: Linux with a supported NVIDIA GPU and a CUDA 13-compatible driver. The project also documents AMD Instinct, Google TPU, Intel GPU and Xeon CPU, Ascend NPU and other platforms on separate hardware pages.Optional. Docker variants exist for NVIDIA, AMD, Intel Arc (beta) and CPU-only inference; portable builds come in CUDA, Vulkan, ROCm and CPU-only versions.
Est. server costGPU server (not estimated)Not estimated
Deploy methodDocker (NVIDIA GPU)Docker Compose (built locally from the repo)
Known gotchas4 listed4 listed
TelemetryNot documentedNone (documented)
Calls home by defaultNot documentedNo (documented)
SSO (OIDC / SAML / LDAP)Not documentedNot documented
Audit logNot documentedNot documented
RBACNot documentedNot documented
DetailsFull SGLang guide →Full TextGen (text-generation-webui) guide →

Key differences

  • License: SGLang: Apache-2.0 (Permissive). TextGen (text-generation-webui): AGPL-3.0 (Network copyleft (AGPL)).
  • GPU: SGLang: needed for practical use. TextGen (text-generation-webui): optional / see notes.
  • Est. server cost: SGLang: GPU server (not estimated). TextGen (text-generation-webui): not estimated (no official RAM figure).
  • Deploy: SGLang: Docker (NVIDIA GPU) · single container. TextGen (text-generation-webui): Docker Compose (built locally from the repo) · multi-container stack.
  • GitHub stars: SGLang: 38.3k. TextGen (text-generation-webui): 47.7k.
  • Last commit: SGLang: Oct 31, 2026. TextGen (text-generation-webui): Aug 17, 2026.
  • Latest release: SGLang: v0.5.22 (Oct 19, 2026). TextGen (text-generation-webui): v4.9 (May 20, 2026).

Same for both: Category: Local model runtimes; Official hardware: not published; Status: Active.

SGLang vs TextGen (text-generation-webui): FAQ

SGLang or TextGen (text-generation-webui): which should a small business choose?

Choose SGLang if you want: fewer license conditions (Permissive vs Network copyleft (AGPL)) and simpler deploy (one container vs a multi-container stack). Choose TextGen (text-generation-webui) if you want: no GPU server needed. TextGen (text-generation-webui) publishes no official RAM figure, so we cannot compare hosting cost directly.

Which is cheaper to self-host, SGLang or TextGen (text-generation-webui)?

SGLang: GPU server (not estimated). TextGen (text-generation-webui): not estimated (no official RAM figure). Our estimate is the cheapest Hetzner Cloud plan that meets each project's official RAM and vCPU figure; it covers the server only.

How much hardware do SGLang and TextGen (text-generation-webui) need?

SGLang: not published. TextGen (text-generation-webui): not published. SGLang needs a GPU for practical use.

What is the license difference between SGLang and TextGen (text-generation-webui)?

SGLang: Apache-2.0 (Permissive). Permissive. Internal and commercial use allowed. Models keep their own licenses. TextGen (text-generation-webui): AGPL-3.0 (Network copyleft (AGPL)). Free for internal and commercial use. If you modify TextGen and let users interact with it over a network, you must offer them the modified source under AGPL-3.0. Models have their own licenses. This is a summary, not legal advice.

Is SGLang or TextGen (text-generation-webui) more actively maintained?

SGLang: Active, last commit Oct 31, 2026. TextGen (text-generation-webui): Active, last commit Aug 17, 2026. GitHub data refreshed Oct 31, 2026.

Which is easier to deploy, SGLang or TextGen (text-generation-webui)?

SGLang installs via Docker (NVIDIA GPU) (single container); TextGen (text-generation-webui) via Docker Compose (built locally from the repo) (multi-container stack). SGLang lists 4 known gotchas and TextGen (text-generation-webui) lists 4; see each app page.

Related

Sources

Every value is generated from the same verified data as the app pages. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.