Activepieces vs Trigger.dev

Short answer

Activepieces: Open-source Zapier alternative with AI agents, MCP and human-in-the-loop steps. Trigger.dev: Platform for background jobs, scheduled tasks and long-running AI agent workflows written in TypeScript. Both are in our Workflow automation with AI category.

Choose Activepieces if you want: larger community (25.4k vs 16.7k GitHub stars) and simpler deploy (one container vs a multi-container stack).

Choose Trigger.dev if you want: fewer license conditions (Permissive vs Open core).

Activepieces publishes no official RAM figure, so we cannot compare hosting cost directly.

Last updated · computed from each project's official docs and live GitHub data · sources

Activepieces vs Trigger.dev side by side

ActivepiecesTrigger.dev
CategoryWorkflow automation with AIWorkflow automation with AI
What it isOpen-source Zapier alternative with AI agents, MCP and human-in-the-loop steps.Platform for background jobs, scheduled tasks and long-running AI agent workflows written in TypeScript.
LicenseMIT (core) + Activepieces Enterprise License (ee directories)Apache-2.0
License typeOpen corePermissive
License conditionsEverything outside packages/ee and packages/server/api/src/app/ee is MIT. Code in those directories needs a commercial license.Permissive. Internal and commercial use allowed; keep license and notices.
StatusActiveActive
GitHub stars25.4k16.7k
Last commitNov 4, 2026Oct 31, 2026
Latest release0.92.3-hotfix.2v4.8.3
Minimum hardwareNot published3 vCPU · 6 GB RAM
Recommended hardwareNot publishedNot published
RAM measured by us1.3 GiB idle, 2.4 GiB working (our test, v0.92.3, Oct 22, 2026)Not tested yet
GPUNot required / not statedNot required / not stated
Est. server costfrom €35.99/mo (based on our test, not official)from €35.99/mo
Deploy methodDocker (single container, embedded DB)Docker Compose
Known gotchas3 listed4 listed
TelemetryOn by defaultNot documented
Calls home by defaultNot documentedNot documented
SSO (OIDC / SAML / LDAP)Paid / enterprise only (SAML paid)Not documented
Audit logPaid / enterprise onlyNot documented
RBACPaid / enterprise onlyNot documented
DetailsFull Activepieces guide →Full Trigger.dev guide →

Key differences

  • License: Activepieces: MIT (core) + Activepieces Enterprise License (ee directories) (Open core). Trigger.dev: Apache-2.0 (Permissive).
  • Official hardware: Activepieces: not published. Trigger.dev: minimum 3 vCPU · 6 GB RAM.
  • Est. server cost: Activepieces: not estimated (no official RAM figure). Trigger.dev: from €35.99/mo.
  • Deploy: Activepieces: Docker (single container, embedded DB) · single container. Trigger.dev: Docker Compose · multi-container stack.
  • GitHub stars: Activepieces: 25.4k. Trigger.dev: 16.7k.
  • Last commit: Activepieces: Nov 4, 2026. Trigger.dev: Oct 31, 2026.
  • Latest release: Activepieces: 0.92.3-hotfix.2 (Oct 28, 2026). Trigger.dev: v4.8.3 (Oct 30, 2026).

Same for both: Category: Workflow automation with AI; GPU: not required or not stated; Status: Active.

Activepieces vs Trigger.dev: FAQ

Activepieces or Trigger.dev: which should a small business choose?

Choose Activepieces if you want: larger community (25.4k vs 16.7k GitHub stars) and simpler deploy (one container vs a multi-container stack). Choose Trigger.dev if you want: fewer license conditions (Permissive vs Open core). Activepieces publishes no official RAM figure, so we cannot compare hosting cost directly.

Which is cheaper to self-host, Activepieces or Trigger.dev?

Activepieces: not estimated (no official RAM figure). Trigger.dev: from €35.99/mo. Our estimate is the cheapest Hetzner Cloud plan that meets each project's official RAM and vCPU figure; it covers the server only.

How much hardware do Activepieces and Trigger.dev need?

Activepieces: not published. Trigger.dev: minimum 3 vCPU · 6 GB RAM.

What is the license difference between Activepieces and Trigger.dev?

Activepieces: MIT (core) + Activepieces Enterprise License (ee directories) (Open core). Everything outside packages/ee and packages/server/api/src/app/ee is MIT. Code in those directories needs a commercial license. Trigger.dev: Apache-2.0 (Permissive). Permissive. Internal and commercial use allowed; keep license and notices. This is a summary, not legal advice.

Is Activepieces or Trigger.dev more actively maintained?

Activepieces: Active, last commit Nov 4, 2026. Trigger.dev: Active, last commit Oct 31, 2026. GitHub data refreshed Nov 4, 2026.

Which is easier to deploy, Activepieces or Trigger.dev?

Activepieces installs via Docker (single container, embedded DB) (single container); Trigger.dev via Docker Compose (multi-container stack). Activepieces lists 3 known gotchas and Trigger.dev lists 4; see each app page.

Related

Sources

Every value is generated from the same verified data as the app pages. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.