Activepieces vs Skyvern

Short answer

Activepieces: Open-source Zapier alternative with AI agents, MCP and human-in-the-loop steps. Skyvern: Browser automation agent that uses LLMs and computer vision to fill forms and run workflows on websites. Both are in our Workflow automation with AI category.

Choose Activepieces if you want: fewer license conditions (Open core vs Network copyleft (AGPL)) and simpler deploy (one container vs a multi-container stack).

Activepieces publishes no official RAM figure, so we cannot compare hosting cost directly.

Last updated · computed from each project's official docs and live GitHub data · sources

Activepieces vs Skyvern side by side

ActivepiecesSkyvern
CategoryWorkflow automation with AIWorkflow automation with AI
What it isOpen-source Zapier alternative with AI agents, MCP and human-in-the-loop steps.Browser automation agent that uses LLMs and computer vision to fill forms and run workflows on websites.
LicenseMIT (core) + Activepieces Enterprise License (ee directories)AGPL-3.0 (anti-bot features only in the managed cloud)
License typeOpen coreNetwork copyleft (AGPL)
License conditionsEverything outside packages/ee and packages/server/api/src/app/ee is MIT. Code in those directories needs a commercial license.Free for internal and commercial use. If you modify Skyvern and let users interact with it over a network, you must offer them the modified source under AGPL-3.0. Anti-bot measures are not in the open-source repository.
StatusActiveActive
GitHub stars25.2k23.3k
Last commitOct 23, 2026Oct 24, 2026
Latest release0.92.3-hotfix.1v1.0.56
Minimum hardwareNot publishedNot published
Recommended hardwareNot published4 GB RAM
RAM measured by us1.3 GiB idle, 2.4 GiB working (our test, v0.92.3, Oct 22, 2026)Not tested yet
GPUNot required / not statedNot required / not stated
Est. server costfrom €35.99/mo (based on our test, not official)from €19.99/mo
Deploy methodDocker (single container, embedded DB)Docker Compose
Known gotchas3 listed4 listed
TelemetryOn by defaultOn by default
Calls home by defaultNot documentedNot documented
SSO (OIDC / SAML / LDAP)Paid / enterprise only (SAML paid)Not documented
Audit logPaid / enterprise onlyNot documented
RBACPaid / enterprise onlyNot documented
DetailsFull Activepieces guide →Full Skyvern guide →

Key differences

  • License: Activepieces: MIT (core) + Activepieces Enterprise License (ee directories) (Open core). Skyvern: AGPL-3.0 (anti-bot features only in the managed cloud) (Network copyleft (AGPL)).
  • Official hardware: Activepieces: not published. Skyvern: recommended 4 GB RAM (no separate minimum published).
  • Est. server cost: Activepieces: not estimated (no official RAM figure). Skyvern: from €19.99/mo.
  • Deploy: Activepieces: Docker (single container, embedded DB) · single container. Skyvern: Docker Compose · multi-container stack.
  • GitHub stars: Activepieces: 25.2k. Skyvern: 23.3k.
  • Last commit: Activepieces: Oct 23, 2026. Skyvern: Oct 24, 2026.
  • Latest release: Activepieces: 0.92.3-hotfix.1 (Oct 23, 2026). Skyvern: v1.0.56 (Oct 14, 2026).

Same for both: Category: Workflow automation with AI; GPU: not required or not stated; Status: Active.

Activepieces vs Skyvern: FAQ

Activepieces or Skyvern: which should a small business choose?

Choose Activepieces if you want: fewer license conditions (Open core vs Network copyleft (AGPL)) and simpler deploy (one container vs a multi-container stack). Activepieces publishes no official RAM figure, so we cannot compare hosting cost directly.

Which is cheaper to self-host, Activepieces or Skyvern?

Activepieces: not estimated (no official RAM figure). Skyvern: from €19.99/mo. Our estimate is the cheapest Hetzner Cloud plan that meets each project's official RAM and vCPU figure; it covers the server only.

How much hardware do Activepieces and Skyvern need?

Activepieces: not published. Skyvern: recommended 4 GB RAM (no separate minimum published).

What is the license difference between Activepieces and Skyvern?

Activepieces: MIT (core) + Activepieces Enterprise License (ee directories) (Open core). Everything outside packages/ee and packages/server/api/src/app/ee is MIT. Code in those directories needs a commercial license. Skyvern: AGPL-3.0 (anti-bot features only in the managed cloud) (Network copyleft (AGPL)). Free for internal and commercial use. If you modify Skyvern and let users interact with it over a network, you must offer them the modified source under AGPL-3.0. Anti-bot measures are not in the open-source repository. This is a summary, not legal advice.

Is Activepieces or Skyvern more actively maintained?

Activepieces: Active, last commit Oct 23, 2026. Skyvern: Active, last commit Oct 24, 2026. GitHub data refreshed Oct 24, 2026.

Which is easier to deploy, Activepieces or Skyvern?

Activepieces installs via Docker (single container, embedded DB) (single container); Skyvern via Docker Compose (multi-container stack). Activepieces lists 3 known gotchas and Skyvern lists 4; see each app page.

Related

Sources

Every value is generated from the same verified data as the app pages. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.