Activepieces vs Windmill

Short answer

Activepieces: Open-source Zapier alternative with AI agents, MCP and human-in-the-loop steps. Windmill: Open-source developer platform for scripts, workflows, AI agents and internal apps, self-hostable. Both are in our Workflow automation with AI category.

Choose Activepieces if you want: simpler deploy (one container vs a multi-container stack).

Activepieces and Windmill publish no official RAM figure, so we cannot compare hosting cost directly.

Last updated · computed from each project's official docs and live GitHub data · sources

Activepieces vs Windmill side by side

ActivepiecesWindmill
CategoryWorkflow automation with AIWorkflow automation with AI
What it isOpen-source Zapier alternative with AI agents, MCP and human-in-the-loop steps.Open-source developer platform for scripts, workflows, AI agents and internal apps, self-hostable.
LicenseMIT (core) + Activepieces Enterprise License (ee directories)AGPLv3 + Apache-2.0 clients; proprietary enterprise code; Community Edition images under Windmill terms
License typeOpen coreOpen core
License conditionsEverything outside packages/ee and packages/server/api/src/app/ee is MIT. Code in those directories needs a commercial license.The source without the "enterprise" flag is AGPLv3 (clients and OpenAPI spec Apache-2.0). The official Community Edition images include proprietary code: free to use internally and redistribute as is, but not to sell, offer as a managed service, modify or wrap. Embedding it in a product you sell needs a commercial license.
StatusActiveActive
GitHub stars25.2k18.3k
Last commitOct 23, 2026Oct 24, 2026
Latest release0.92.3-hotfix.1v1.848.2
Minimum hardwareNot publishedNot published
Recommended hardwareNot publishedNot published
RAM measured by us1.3 GiB idle, 2.4 GiB working (our test, v0.92.3, Oct 22, 2026)Not tested yet
GPUNot required / not statedNot required / not stated
Est. server costfrom €35.99/mo (based on our test, not official)Not estimated
Deploy methodDocker (single container, embedded DB)Docker Compose
Known gotchas3 listed4 listed
TelemetryOn by defaultOn by default
Calls home by defaultNot documentedNot documented
SSO (OIDC / SAML / LDAP)Paid / enterprise only (SAML paid)Free with limits (OIDC free with limits · SAML paid)
Audit logPaid / enterprise onlyBasic free, more in paid plan
RBACPaid / enterprise onlyBasic free, more in paid plan
DetailsFull Activepieces guide →Full Windmill guide →

Key differences

  • License: Activepieces: MIT (core) + Activepieces Enterprise License (ee directories) (Open core). Windmill: AGPLv3 + Apache-2.0 clients; proprietary enterprise code; Community Edition images under Windmill terms (Open core).
  • Deploy: Activepieces: Docker (single container, embedded DB) · single container. Windmill: Docker Compose · multi-container stack.
  • GitHub stars: Activepieces: 25.2k. Windmill: 18.3k.
  • Last commit: Activepieces: Oct 23, 2026. Windmill: Oct 24, 2026.
  • Latest release: Activepieces: 0.92.3-hotfix.1 (Oct 23, 2026). Windmill: v1.848.2 (Oct 24, 2026).

Same for both: Category: Workflow automation with AI; Official hardware: not published; GPU: not required or not stated; Est. server cost: not estimated (no official RAM figure); Status: Active.

Activepieces vs Windmill: FAQ

Activepieces or Windmill: which should a small business choose?

Choose Activepieces if you want: simpler deploy (one container vs a multi-container stack). Activepieces and Windmill publish no official RAM figure, so we cannot compare hosting cost directly.

Which is cheaper to self-host, Activepieces or Windmill?

Activepieces: not estimated (no official RAM figure). Windmill: not estimated (no official RAM figure). Our estimate is the cheapest Hetzner Cloud plan that meets each project's official RAM and vCPU figure; it covers the server only.

How much hardware do Activepieces and Windmill need?

Activepieces: not published. Windmill: not published.

What is the license difference between Activepieces and Windmill?

Activepieces: MIT (core) + Activepieces Enterprise License (ee directories) (Open core). Everything outside packages/ee and packages/server/api/src/app/ee is MIT. Code in those directories needs a commercial license. Windmill: AGPLv3 + Apache-2.0 clients; proprietary enterprise code; Community Edition images under Windmill terms (Open core). The source without the "enterprise" flag is AGPLv3 (clients and OpenAPI spec Apache-2.0). The official Community Edition images include proprietary code: free to use internally and redistribute as is, but not to sell, offer as a managed service, modify or wrap. Embedding it in a product you sell needs a commercial license. This is a summary, not legal advice.

Is Activepieces or Windmill more actively maintained?

Activepieces: Active, last commit Oct 23, 2026. Windmill: Active, last commit Oct 24, 2026. GitHub data refreshed Oct 24, 2026.

Which is easier to deploy, Activepieces or Windmill?

Activepieces installs via Docker (single container, embedded DB) (single container); Windmill via Docker Compose (multi-container stack). Activepieces lists 3 known gotchas and Windmill lists 4; see each app page.

Related

Sources

Every value is generated from the same verified data as the app pages. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.