Dify vs LangBot
Short answer
Dify: Visual platform for building LLM apps, RAG chatbots, agents and workflows. LangBot: Platform for AI chatbots on WeChat, WeCom, QQ, Feishu, DingTalk, Slack, Discord and Telegram, run from one dashboard. Both are in our AI app & agent builders category.
Choose Dify if you want: larger community (160k vs 18.7k GitHub stars).
Choose LangBot if you want: fewer license conditions (Permissive vs Custom / conditional).
LangBot publishes no official RAM figure, so we cannot compare hosting cost directly.
Last updated · computed from each project's official docs and live GitHub data · sources
Dify vs LangBot side by side
| Dify | LangBot | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI app & agent builders | AI app & agent builders |
| What it is | Visual platform for building LLM apps, RAG chatbots, agents and workflows. | Platform for AI chatbots on WeChat, WeCom, QQ, Feishu, DingTalk, Slack, Discord and Telegram, run from one dashboard. |
| License | Dify Open Source License (modified Apache-2.0) | Apache-2.0 |
| License type | Custom / conditional | Permissive |
| License conditions | Commercial use is allowed, including as a backend for your own apps. Extra conditions: you may not run a multi-tenant service (one tenant = one workspace) without written permission, and you may not remove or modify the Dify logo or copyright in the frontend. | Permissive. Internal and commercial use allowed; keep license and notices. |
| Status | Active | Active |
| GitHub stars | 160k | 18.7k |
| Last commit | Nov 4, 2026 | Nov 4, 2026 |
| Latest release | 1.18.0 | v4.11.4 |
| Minimum hardware | 2 vCPU · 4 GB RAM | Not published |
| Recommended hardware | Not published | Not published |
| RAM measured by us | Not tested yet | Not tested yet |
| GPU | Not required / not stated | Not required / not stated |
| Est. server cost | from €19.99/mo | Not estimated |
| Deploy method | Docker Compose | Docker Compose |
| Known gotchas | 2 listed | 4 listed |
| Telemetry | On by default | On by default |
| Calls home by default | Yes, by default | Yes, by default |
| SSO (OIDC / SAML / LDAP) | Paid / enterprise only | Not documented |
| Audit log | Not documented | Not documented |
| RBAC | Basic free, more in paid plan | Yes, free |
| Details | Full Dify guide → | Full LangBot guide → |
Key differences
- License: Dify: Dify Open Source License (modified Apache-2.0) (Custom / conditional). LangBot: Apache-2.0 (Permissive).
- Official hardware: Dify: minimum 2 vCPU · 4 GB RAM. LangBot: not published.
- Est. server cost: Dify: from €19.99/mo. LangBot: not estimated (no official RAM figure).
- GitHub stars: Dify: 160k. LangBot: 18.7k.
- Latest release: Dify: 1.18.0 (Oct 23, 2026). LangBot: v4.11.4 (Oct 29, 2026).
Same for both: Category: AI app & agent builders; GPU: not required or not stated; Deploy: Docker Compose · multi-container stack; Status: Active; Last commit: Nov 4, 2026.
Dify vs LangBot: FAQ
Dify or LangBot: which should a small business choose?
Choose Dify if you want: larger community (160k vs 18.7k GitHub stars). Choose LangBot if you want: fewer license conditions (Permissive vs Custom / conditional). LangBot publishes no official RAM figure, so we cannot compare hosting cost directly.
Which is cheaper to self-host, Dify or LangBot?
Dify: from €19.99/mo. LangBot: not estimated (no official RAM figure). Our estimate is the cheapest Hetzner Cloud plan that meets each project's official RAM and vCPU figure; it covers the server only.
How much hardware do Dify and LangBot need?
Dify: minimum 2 vCPU · 4 GB RAM. LangBot: not published.
What is the license difference between Dify and LangBot?
Dify: Dify Open Source License (modified Apache-2.0) (Custom / conditional). Commercial use is allowed, including as a backend for your own apps. Extra conditions: you may not run a multi-tenant service (one tenant = one workspace) without written permission, and you may not remove or modify the Dify logo or copyright in the frontend. LangBot: Apache-2.0 (Permissive). Permissive. Internal and commercial use allowed; keep license and notices. This is a summary, not legal advice.
Is Dify or LangBot more actively maintained?
Dify: Active, last commit Nov 4, 2026. LangBot: Active, last commit Nov 4, 2026. GitHub data refreshed Nov 4, 2026.
Which is easier to deploy, Dify or LangBot?
Dify installs via Docker Compose (multi-container stack); LangBot via Docker Compose (multi-container stack). Dify lists 2 known gotchas and LangBot lists 4; see each app page.
Related
- Dify self-hosting guide · LangBot self-hosting guide
- All Dify alternatives, ranked
- All LangBot alternatives, ranked
- Activepieces vs Dify
- Agent Zero vs Dify
- Agent Zero vs LangBot
- AstrBot vs Dify
- AstrBot vs LangBot
- AutoGPT Platform vs Dify
- AutoGPT Platform vs LangBot
- CowAgent vs Dify
- CowAgent vs LangBot
- Coze Studio vs Dify
- Coze Studio vs LangBot
- DB-GPT vs Dify
- Add a third app in the interactive comparison
Sources
- Dify GitHub repository: github.com/langgenius/dify
- Dify documentation, Dify hardware requirements: docs.dify.ai/en/self-host/deploy/quick-start/docker-compose
- Dify license: github.com/langgenius/dify/blob/main/LICENSE
- Dify deploy instructions: github.com/langgenius/dify#quick-start
- LangBot GitHub repository: github.com/langbot-app/LangBot
- LangBot documentation, LangBot hardware requirements, LangBot deploy instructions: langbot.app/docs/en/deploy/langbot/docker
- LangBot license: github.com/langbot-app/LangBot/blob/master/LICENSE
- Hetzner Cloud pricing used for cost estimates (read 2026-11-01): www.hetzner.com/cloud/regular-performance
- GitHub REST API (stars, commits, releases): docs.github.com/en/rest
Every value is generated from the same verified data as the app pages. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.