LightRAG vs PipesHub
Short answer
LightRAG: Graph-based RAG server that builds a knowledge graph from your documents, with a web UI and REST API. PipesHub: Self-hosted workplace search and AI answers across 50+ connected apps, filtered by each user's permissions. Both are in our Knowledge base & RAG category.
Choose LightRAG if you want: larger community (40.4k vs 3.9k GitHub stars).
LightRAG publishes no official RAM figure, so we cannot compare hosting cost directly.
Last updated · computed from each project's official docs and live GitHub data · sources
LightRAG vs PipesHub side by side
| LightRAG | PipesHub | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Knowledge base & RAG | Knowledge base & RAG |
| What it is | Graph-based RAG server that builds a knowledge graph from your documents, with a web UI and REST API. | Self-hosted workplace search and AI answers across 50+ connected apps, filtered by each user's permissions. |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| License type | Permissive | Permissive |
| License conditions | Permissive. Internal and commercial use allowed. Models keep their own licenses. | Permissive. Internal and commercial use allowed; keep the license and notices. |
| Status | Active | Active |
| GitHub stars | 40.4k | 3.9k |
| Last commit | Oct 14, 2026 | Oct 31, 2026 |
| Latest release | v1.5.7 | v1.0.0 |
| Minimum hardware | Not published | 8 GB RAM |
| Recommended hardware | Not published | 16 GB RAM |
| RAM measured by us | Not tested yet | Not tested yet |
| GPU | No. It calls the model providers you configure. | Not required / not stated |
| Est. server cost | Not estimated | from €35.99/mo (recommended spec: €69.99/mo) |
| Deploy method | Docker Compose | Docker Compose (interactive installer) |
| Known gotchas | 4 listed | 4 listed |
| Telemetry | Not documented | On by default |
| Calls home by default | Not documented | Not documented |
| SSO (OIDC / SAML / LDAP) | Not documented | Free |
| Audit log | Not documented | Not documented |
| RBAC | Not documented | Not documented |
| Details | Full LightRAG guide → | Full PipesHub guide → |
Key differences
- License: LightRAG: MIT (Permissive). PipesHub: Apache-2.0 (Permissive).
- Official hardware: LightRAG: not published. PipesHub: minimum 8 GB RAM (recommended 16 GB RAM).
- GPU: LightRAG: optional / see notes. PipesHub: not required or not stated.
- Est. server cost: LightRAG: not estimated (no official RAM figure). PipesHub: from €35.99/mo.
- Deploy: LightRAG: Docker Compose · multi-container stack. PipesHub: Docker Compose (interactive installer) · multi-container stack.
- GitHub stars: LightRAG: 40.4k. PipesHub: 3.9k.
- Last commit: LightRAG: Oct 14, 2026. PipesHub: Oct 31, 2026.
- Latest release: LightRAG: v1.5.7 (Sep 2, 2026). PipesHub: v1.0.0 (Oct 27, 2026).
Same for both: Category: Knowledge base & RAG; Status: Active.
LightRAG vs PipesHub: FAQ
LightRAG or PipesHub: which should a small business choose?
Choose LightRAG if you want: larger community (40.4k vs 3.9k GitHub stars). LightRAG publishes no official RAM figure, so we cannot compare hosting cost directly.
Which is cheaper to self-host, LightRAG or PipesHub?
LightRAG: not estimated (no official RAM figure). PipesHub: from €35.99/mo. Our estimate is the cheapest Hetzner Cloud plan that meets each project's official RAM and vCPU figure; it covers the server only.
How much hardware do LightRAG and PipesHub need?
LightRAG: not published. PipesHub: minimum 8 GB RAM (recommended 16 GB RAM).
What is the license difference between LightRAG and PipesHub?
LightRAG: MIT (Permissive). Permissive. Internal and commercial use allowed. Models keep their own licenses. PipesHub: Apache-2.0 (Permissive). Permissive. Internal and commercial use allowed; keep the license and notices. This is a summary, not legal advice.
Is LightRAG or PipesHub more actively maintained?
LightRAG: Active, last commit Oct 14, 2026. PipesHub: Active, last commit Oct 31, 2026. GitHub data refreshed Oct 31, 2026.
Which is easier to deploy, LightRAG or PipesHub?
LightRAG installs via Docker Compose (multi-container stack); PipesHub via Docker Compose (interactive installer) (multi-container stack). LightRAG lists 4 known gotchas and PipesHub lists 4; see each app page.
Related
- LightRAG self-hosting guide · PipesHub self-hosting guide
- All LightRAG alternatives, ranked
- All PipesHub alternatives, ranked
- AFFiNE vs LightRAG
- AFFiNE vs PipesHub
- AnythingLLM vs LightRAG
- AnythingLLM vs PipesHub
- DocsGPT vs LightRAG
- DocsGPT vs PipesHub
- FastGPT vs LightRAG
- FastGPT vs PipesHub
- kotaemon vs LightRAG
- kotaemon vs PipesHub
- Langchain-Chatchat vs LightRAG
- Langchain-Chatchat vs PipesHub
- Add a third app in the interactive comparison
Sources
- LightRAG GitHub repository: github.com/HKUDS/LightRAG
- LightRAG documentation: github.com/HKUDS/LightRAG/blob/main/docs/LightRAG-API-Server.md
- LightRAG license: github.com/HKUDS/LightRAG/blob/main/LICENSE
- LightRAG hardware requirements: github.com/HKUDS/LightRAG#selecting-backend-storage
- LightRAG deploy instructions: github.com/HKUDS/LightRAG#install-lightrag-server
- PipesHub GitHub repository: github.com/pipeshub-ai/pipeshub-ai
- PipesHub documentation: docs.pipeshub.com
- PipesHub license: github.com/pipeshub-ai/pipeshub-ai/blob/main/LICENSE
- PipesHub hardware requirements: github.com/pipeshub-ai/pipeshub-ai/blob/main/deployment/docker-compose/ADVANCED_DEPLOYMENT.md#deployment-types-slim-vs-full-vs-eval
- PipesHub deploy instructions: github.com/pipeshub-ai/pipeshub-ai/blob/main/deployment/docker-compose/ADVANCED_DEPLOYMENT.md
- Hetzner Cloud pricing used for cost estimates (read 2026-10-25): www.hetzner.com/cloud/regular-performance
- GitHub REST API (stars, commits, releases): docs.github.com/en/rest
Every value is generated from the same verified data as the app pages. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.